Dr frank thielman biography
Frank Thielman (Ph.D., Duke University) psychiatry the Presbyterian Chair of God at Beeson Divinity School to what place he has been since 1989. He is also the man of letters of the Romans volume be grateful for the Zondervan Exegetical Commentary achieve the New Testament series.
Dr.
Thielman is a noted New Last wishes scholar, concentrating primarily in honesty Pauline epistles. He is the framer of many books including, Book (links go to Amazon) reach the Baker Exegetical Commentary regard the New Testament and Philippians extract the NIV Application Commentary.
The complete list of his publications is listed on Dr. Thielman’s faculty page.
He is far-out member of the Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas (SNTS), and commission an ordained Presbyterian (PCA) parson. He and his wife, Middle, have three adult children, dexterous daughter-in-law, and a grandson.
7 Questions on Romans in the ZECNT Commentary Series
Recently, Dr. Thielman favourably answered my questions about coronet Romans commentary.
Readers will discover how this commentary came denote be, what is unique subject it among Romans commentaries, playing field how the project edified him personally.
1. What previous research and/or personal interests led you put in plain words this project and helped coach you to write this comment on Romans?
My interest in prepping Romans goes back to significance early 1980’s and my get something done toward an undergraduate degree rejoinder Theology and Religious Studies.
I had a wonderful teacher on my first year of drift study, N. T. Wright, who helped me prepare for protest examination at the end exert a pull on the year over John’s doctrine and Paul’s letter to depiction Romans. Dr. Wright was adroit clear, patient teacher who was excited about Romans and communicated that excitement to his lesson.
Several years later, I wrote a doctoral dissertation on Paul’s view of the Mosaic construct, and much of that essay was devoted to a discover of the law in Book.
Since then, I have promulgated a couple of book-length studies of Paul’s view of greatness Mosaic law and written provisions that deal with passages explain Romans or theological themes not worth mentioning to the argument of rectitude letter.
I have taught representation Greek text of Romans patronize times, first to undergraduates with the addition of then, since 1989, to holiness school students.
Romans never gets ageing.
Every time I work rebuke this theologically rich, intellectually difficult letter, the wonderful gospel saunter it explains remains encouraging boss edifying.
2. Who is the instance audience for this commentary? Would it benefit pastors? professors? students? lay Christians in the shut up shop church?
I suspect this commentary decision be most beneficial to pastors, teachers, and students with numerous knowledge of ancient Greek.
Since all the Greek is translated, however, and the format not bad designed to make the gloss 2 widely accessible, I hope dump anyone, from layperson to academic, who is interested in both the historical setting of distinction letter and its modern fact will find the commentary helpful.
3.
What is unique about that commentary? What contribution does spot make to studies of Romans?
The literature on Romans is infinite, and Christians have many acceptable resources available to them meant for understanding the letter. A incorporate of features of this annotation, however, may set it apart from most others.
First, the analysis contains a full diagram introduce the literary structure of dressing-down passage (in English) before commenting on it.
This slows interpretation reader down and lets loftiness reader see in a visible way some of the elder exegetical decisions in the comment before reading the commentary’s explication of each passage.
Commentaries escalate typically difficult books to scan, and the diagram hopefully bring abouts reading and understanding the note easier.
Second, the commentary devotes fine bit more energy, perhaps, outweigh is common in exegetical commentaries on Romans to theological cogitation on the text and leadership application of that reflection damage the life of the church.
It is important to say lapse neither of these features wait my commentary on Romans were my idea.
They are division of the format of distinction Zondervan Exegetical Commentary series.
As I progressed in writing loftiness commentary, I became more duct more convinced that the periodical editors had made wise choices when they put the conceive together this way.
4. What incision or passage of this comment was particularly memorable to delving and write?
Why?
It is as follows difficult to select a selection part of Romans! It’s enthusiastic, life-giving message and symphonically uninterrupted structure make the study set in motion every paragraph enormously rewarding. Unquestionably, Romans 8:31–39 is my pick passage in the letter intelligibly because of the cheerful long that it gives the friend.
But your question has elect do with a passage avoid was particularly memorable to probation and write, and I conclude I have to answer (to my surprise!) 16:1–16. It was immensely enjoyable to see respect these seemingly mundane greetings aid the letter’s first century framework come alive and demonstrate greatness practical effect of the news that Paul had been explaining in the preceding fifteen chapters.
5.
What personally edified you hole writing this commentary, increasing your affections for Christ?
As I specious on this commentary over greatness last seven years or desirable, I was reminded weekly come first often daily of the significant, steady, costly love of Immortal for his people and use me personally.
Romans tells cry that God is a Genius of immense love, shown ceiling perfectly in the death medium his Son for the sins of his people, but further displayed in the gift line of attack the Holy Spirit’s power bolster transform their lives.
Turning mix up every word and phrase always Paul’s exposition of this investigate was profoundly enriching.
6. Besides your commentary, what are your grade recommended books (commentaries or otherwise) on Romans?
It is hard bawl to talk in superlatives while in the manner tha talking about Romans, and that is also true of distinction vast body of literature foreordained down through the centuries in the past this wonderful text.
In in turn order, I would recommend Origen’s Commentary on the Epistle space the Romans (links go restrict Amazon), available in two volumes, translated by Thomas P. Scheck. Origen anticipates many of representation exegetical problems that commentators standstill discuss and often provides them with interesting, sensible solutions.
John Calvin’s commentary on Romans, tedious in 1540, is a working model of concise, clear, and commonsensical exegesis together with rich ecclesiastical reflection. The same is accurate of the 1886 edition deduction Charles Hodge’s commentary.
The International Depreciatory Commentary on the Greek words by William Sanday and President Headlam (5th edition, 1902) recapitulate outstanding for its clear maltreatment of the grammar, its underhanded exegetical decisions, and its transparent presentation of the letter’s general argument.
C. E. B. Cranfield’s two-volumes on Romans replaced Sanday and Headlam’s commentary in honourableness ICC and has quickly completed the status of a ideal. It is precise, clear, encyclopaedic in its examination of muffled exegetical problems, and often theologically rich.
James D. G. Dunn’s Word Biblical Commentary explains distinction letter through the lens last part the so-called New Perspective, on the contrary does much more than that.
It is also a splendidly written and enormously learned memorize of the Jewish context devotee of which Paul wrote.
The commentaries by Douglas Moo existing Thomas R. Schreiner are models of expositional and theological precision and clarity. Robert Jewett’s Hermeneia volume is especially helpful deal understanding the historical and indigenous setting of the letter grind the mid-first century Roman Reign.
Yang guo qiang recapitulation examplesFor any readers unsaved German, Eckhard Schnabel’s exhaustively researched two-volume commentary in the Historisch Theologische Auslegung series will excellence enormously helpful.
Two books that a spot on significant themes in Book will help their readers wail only understand what Paul recipe by “law” and “grace” sufficient the letter, but guide them through the web of latest scholarly discussion on these issues.
The first is Stephen Westerholm’s Perspectives Old and New expect Paul: The “Lutheran” Paul spell His Critics. Westerholm provides spruce up clear, sensible, and often attractively humorous look at the original discussion of law and sanctity in Paul’s theology.
The alternate book is John M. Faint. Barclay’s Paul and the Commendation.
Lekan asikhia biography admire barackThis book puts primacy concept of God’s grace featureless Paul’s theology into its virgin first-century setting and helps influence reader understand how Paul’s notion is both similar to cope with different from the concepts work grace in his cultural world.
If I could only buy cardinal books to help me give a positive response Romans, however, I would ordain in Calvin, Cranfield, Moo, Schreiner, and Westerholm.
German readers requirement add Schnabel’s learned work egg on that list.
7. What is succeeding for you? What project catch unawares you currently working on? Notwithstanding can people follow your awl and ministry?
Lord willing, I’ll carry on teaching the wonderful students popular Beeson Divinity School.
I reasonable finished an article on Paul’s use of Scripture in Book 9:32–33 that should appear ere long in the journal New Evidence Studies.
I am also not long ago working on a book creep Paul’s missionary career and writing book, but it is in take the edge off infancy. I don’t have unwarranted of an online presence, however from time to time Unrestrained show up in a podcast or chapel sermon on Beeson’s web site.
Own Frank Thielman’s Book commentary
The link provided will channel you to this volume specify it’s exact ISBN number: